1.Stakeholder map

Maximum 5 Marks
 

Sets out the business case, and summarises other aspects of the project, including ‘needs and features’, and other product requirements, in a way that demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights and awareness of deeper more subtle aspects of the topic content. Evidence of having researched/read more widely beyond the core materials. Clearly shows Stakeholder map.

Sets out the business case, and summarises other aspects of the project, including ‘needs and features’, and other product requirements, in a way that demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights and awareness of many of the deeper more subtle aspects of the topic content.
Evidence of having read beyond the core materials. Clearly shows Stakeholder map.

Sets out the business case, and summarises other aspects of the project, including ‘needs and features’, and other product requirements, in a way that demonstrates thorough understanding of material presented in core texts and readings. Shows Stakeholder map.

Sets out the business case, and summarises other aspects of the project, including ‘needs and features’, and other product requirements, in a way that demonstrates evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. However literature is presented uncritically in a purely descriptive manner.
Content acknowledged but not really taken into account. Lists stakeholders.

Sets out the business case, and summarises other aspects of the project, including ‘needs and features’, and other product requirements, in a way that demonstrates very little evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. Inaccurate or inconsistent acknowledgment of sources.
Limited knowledge of key principles and concepts. Stakeholders not listed or inappropriate.

2.Questionnaire 

Maximum 5 Marks

5 or more questions are stated that demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights to and awareness of many of the deeper more subtle aspects of the topic. Evidence of having read beyond the core material.

4 or more questions are stated that demonstrates breadth of understanding and has insights to aspects of the topic. Evidence of having read the core material.

3 or more questions are stated that demonstrates understanding. Evidence of having read the core material.

2 or less questions stated, little evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. Basic knowledge of key principles and concepts.

1 or less questions stated, very little evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. Limited knowledge of key principles and concepts.

3.Functional Requirements

Maximum 16 Marks
 

 Use Case Model and descriptions, including a critical core use case. Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights and awareness of deeper more subtle aspects of the topic content. Evidence of having researched/read more widely beyond the core materials.

 Use Case Model and descriptions, including a critical core use case. Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights and awareness of many of the deeper more subtle aspects of the topic content. Evidence of having read beyond the core materials.

 Use Case Model and descriptions, including a critical core use case. Demonstrates thorough understanding of material presented in core texts and readings.

 Use Case Model and descriptions, including a critical core use case. Demonstrates evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. However literature is presented uncritically in a purely descriptive manner. Content acknowledged but not really taken into account.

 Use Case Model and descriptions, including a critical core use case. Demonstrates very little evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. Inaccurate or inconsistent acknowledgment of sources.
Limited knowledge of key principles and concepts.

4.Presentation, writing style, grammar and references

Maximum 4 Marks

Highly developed skills in expression and presentation of response.
Fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task.
Grammar and spelling accurate. Well-organised.

Well-developed skills in expression and presentation of response.
Fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task.
Grammar and spelling accurate.

Good skills in expression and clear presentation of response.
Mostly fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task.
Grammar and spelling accurate.

Some skills in expression and presentation of response.
Meaning apparent but writing style not always fluent or well organised.
Grammar and spelling contain errors.

Rudimentary skills in expression and presentation of response.
Not all material is relevant and/or is presented in a disorganised manner.
Meaning apparent but writing style not fluent or well-organised,
Grammar and spelling contain errors.