Final Project 1
)
Create an ORIGINAL math assessment consisting of 25 original (not copied, downloaded, taken from your district’s assessments, etc.) math questions. Your assessment will consist of 12 enhanced multiple-choice items, 8 constructed response items, and 5 performance items. See Appendix B for complete details. You are to use the same Mississippi Mathematics competency 5.MD.5 that you've used for other assignments in this course.
Multiple-Choice Items (12 questions)
· Purpose: Assess CCRS math standards and incorporate both math standards and math practices in real-world applications.
· Math multiple-choice questions assess procedural and conceptual standards.
· All questions require the integration of multiple skills and concepts.
· Answer choices – all distractors will be based on plausible missteps.
· Questions will vary in format, with a minimum of 4 different formats being used.
· See Unit 2B lecture for examples of different possible formats.
Math Assessment Grading Rubric
|
Criterion |
Advanced – 4 |
Proficient – 3 |
Basic – 2 |
Minimal – 1 |
|
Multiple-Choice Questions – number of questions
|
More than 12 multiple choice questions; more than 4 different formats appropriately used (6 pts) |
12 multiple choice questions;4 different formats appropriately used (5.1 pts) |
10 – 11 multiple choice questions; 3 appropriately used formats or 4 minimally appropriate formats (4.2 pts) |
fewer than 10 multiple choice questions; insufficient or inappropriately used formats (3.3 pts) |
|
Multiple-Choice Questions – content of questions
|
As a whole, the questions deeply assess the content of the objective at the targeted instructional level; includes integration of multiple skills and concepts (16 pts) |
All questions adequately assess the content of the objective at the targeted instructional level; includes integration of multiple skills and concepts (13.6 pts) |
Between half and most questions adequately assess the content of the objective at the targeted instructional level; includes integration of multiple skills or concepts (11.2 pts) |
Fewer than half of the questions adequately assess the content of the objective at the targeted instructional level; includes a few skills or concepts (8.8 pts) |
|
Multiple-Choice Questions – quality of distractors
|
All distractors represent logical errors students can be expected to make; distractors are ordered logically. (12 pts) |
All distractors represent logical errors students can be expected to make (10.2 pts) |
Most distractors represent common student errors but several are unrelated to common cognitive errors. (8.4 pts) |
Distractors bear little to no connection with common student errors. (6.6 pts) |
|
Multiple-Choice Questions – Originality |
All 12+ questions are completely original to the author (8 pts) |
All 12 questions are completely original to the author (6.8 pts) |
Most questions are original to the author but some are copied from an outside source. (5.6 pts) |
Few questions are original to the author and many are copied from an outside source. (4.4 pts) |
|
Multiple-Choice Questions – concept focus InTASC 6 CAEP R1.3 Content |
Question focus is a mix of procedure and concept standards with an emphasis on concept. (12 pts) |
Question focus is an equal mix of procedural and conceptual standards (10.2 pts) |
Question focus is a mix of procedure and concept with an emphasis on procedure (8.4 pts) |
Questions focus predominantly on procedural standards (6.6 pts) |
|
Constructed Response Questions – number of questions |
More than 8 constructed response questions; more than 3 different formats appropriately used (6 pts) |
8 constructed response questions;3 different formats appropriately used (5.1 pts) |
6 -7 constructed response questions; 2 appropriately used formats or 3 minimally appropriate formats (4.2 pts) |
fewer than 6 constructed response questions; insufficient or inappropriately used formats (3.3 pts) |
|
Constructed Response Questions – content of questions |
As a whole, the questions deeply assess the content of the objective at the targeted instructional level (16 pts) |
All questions adequately assess the content of the objective at the targeted instructional level (13.6 pts) |
Between half and most questions adequately assess the content of the objective at the targeted instructional level (11.2 pts) |
Fewer than half of the questions adequately assess the content of the objective at the targeted instructional level (8.8 pts) |
|
Constructed Response Questions – Originality |
All 8+ questions are completely original to the author (8 pts) |
All 8 questions are completely original to the author (6.8 pts) |
Most questions are original to the author but some are copied from an outside source. (5.6 pts) |
Few questions are original to the author and many are copied from an outside source. (4.4 pts) |
|
Constructed Response Questions – concept focus InTASC 6 CAEP R1.3 Content |
Question focus is a mix of procedure and concept standards with an emphasis on concept. (12 pts) |
Question focus is an equal mix of procedural and conceptual standards (10.2 pts) |
Question focus is a mix of procedure and concept with an emphasis on procedure (8.4 pts) |
Questions focus predominantly on procedural standards (6.6 pts) |
Math Assessment Grading Rubric (cont.)
|
Criterion |
Advanced – 4 |
Proficient – 3 |
Basic – 2 |
Minimal – 1 |
|
Performance Task – number of problems
|
More than 5 performance task problems (6 pts) |
5 performance task problems (5.1 pts) |
3 – 4 performance task problems (4.2 pts) |
fewer than 3 performance task problems (3.3 pts) |
|
Performance Task – construction |
Each question consists of multiple parts; each part conceptually related (8 pts) |
Each question consists of multiple parts; each part conceptually related (6.8 pts) |
Each question consists of multiple parts but each part not conceptually related (5.6 pts) |
Some questions consist of multiple parts but each part not conceptually related (4.4 pts) |
|
Performance Task – originality |
All 8+ questions are completely original to the author (8 pts) |
All 8 questions are completely original to the author (6.8 pts) |
Most questions are original to the author but some are copied from an outside source. (5.6 pts) |
Few questions are original to the author and many are copied from an outside source. (4.4 pts) |
|
Performance Task –Content of Questions
|
As a whole, the questions deeply assess the content of the objective at the targeted instructional level (16 pts) |
All questions adequately assess the content of the objective at the targeted instructional level (13.6 pts) |
Between half and most questions adequately assess the content of the objective at the targeted instructional level (11.2 pts) |
Fewer than half of the questions adequately assess the content of the objective at the targeted instructional level (8.8 pts) |
|
Performance Task – Concept Focus InTASC 6 CAEP R1.3 Content |
Question focus is a mix of procedure and concept standards with an emphasis on concept. (12 pts) |
Question focus is an equal mix of procedural and conceptual standards (10.2 pts) |
Question focus is a mix of procedure and concept with an emphasis on procedure (8.4 pts) |
Questions focus predominantly on procedural standards (6.8 pts) |
|
APA-compliant formatting
|
Consistently follows APA format. There is a properly formatted and accurate reference page (NO errors) (5 pts) |
Consistently follows APA format. There is a properly formatted and accurate reference page (1-2 MINOR errors). (4.25 pts) |
Limited (3-5) APA errors in APA format including title page, running heads, citations, quotations or references. (3.5 pts) |
More than 5 APA errors in format including title page, running heads, citations, quotations or references. (2.75 pts) |
|
Mechanics
|
The presentation demonstrates exceptional use of standard English conventions (mechanics, usage, grammar and syntax). NO ERRORS. (5 pts) |
The presentation demonstrates consistent use of standard English conventions (mechanics, usage, grammar and syntax). (1-2 MINOR errors). (4.25 pts) |
The presentation demonstrates inconsistent use of standard English conventions (mechanics, usage, grammar and syntax). (3-5 errors). (3.5 pts) |
The presentation does NOT demonstrate use of standard English conventions (mechanics, usage, grammar and syntax). (More than 5 errors). (2.75 pts) |
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more
Recent Comments