This paper will help you understand these two classic decision-making models, which will provide value in your personal and professional life.

Decision making in public administration can be viewed as following one of two main models: the scientific (rational) model or the incremental (ad hoc or garbage can) model. The models are described in more detail in the following resources: Public Administration and Policy Analysis: Rationality vs. “Muddling Through” and The Science of Muddling Through. It seems logical that the rational decision-making model may be the best choice in every case. However, there are times when it is impossible to take the time to logically analyze a decision.

For example, when “Sully” Sullenberger landed a plane in the Hudson, he was forced to use the ad hoc incrementalism decision-making model. You can read more about Sully’s decision in this article “Sully” Sullenberger Remembers the Miracle on the Hudson. 

Compare and contrast ad hoc incrementalism and the rational decision-making models, using examples. Specifically the following critical elements must be addressed:

I. Compare and contrast ad hoc incrementalism and rational decision making models.

II. Use examples of each type of model to illustrate the similarities and differences.